Further information:
QIAGEN Plasmid Purification
System
For purification of up to 10 mg endotoxin-free ultrapure plasmid or cosmid DNA
| EndoFree Plasmid Kit Options | ||||
| Expected yield* | Column capacity | Culture volume† | QIAfilter format | |
| EndoFree Plasmid Maxi Kit | Up to 500 µg | 500 µg | 100¨C250 ml | Syringe-format Maxi Cartridge |
| EndoFree Plasmid Mega Kit | Up to 2.5 mg | 2.5 mg | 500 ml¨C2.5 liters | Vacuum-operated Mega-Giga Cartridge |
| EndoFree Plasmid Giga Kit‡ | Up to 10 mg | 10 mg | 2.5 liters | Vacuum-operated Mega-Giga Cartridge |
* Actual yields depend on plasmid copy
number, size of insert, host strain, culture medium, and culture volume.
† Culture volumes depend on plasmid copy
number, size of insert, host strain, and culture medium.
‡ For purification of low-copy plasmids
and cosmids, EndoFree Plasmid Mega Kits are a better choice than EndoFree
Plasmid Giga Kits, due to the large culture volumes required and the limited
capacity of the QIAfilter Mega-Giga Cartridge
Endotoxins, also known as lipopolysaccharides or LPS, are
cell-membrane components of Gram-negative bacteria such as E.
coli (see figure "Schematic diagram of the envelope
of E. coli."). Endotoxins are released
during the lysis step of plasmid purification and significantly reduce
transfection efficiencies in endotoxin sensitive cell lines (see figures "Plasmid
Purification Method vs. Transfection Efficiency"and "Plasmid
Purity vs. Transfection Efficiency" and tables "Endotoxin
levels in plasmid preparations" and "EndoFree
DNA yields high transfection efficiencies with primary cells").
Furthermore, endotoxins can influence the uptake of plasmid DNA in transfection
experiments by competing with DNA for ¡°free¡± transfection reagent.
Endotoxins also induce nonspecific activation of immune responses in immune
cells such as macrophages and B cells, which can lead to misinterpretation of
transfection results. These responses include induced synthesis of proteins and
lipids such as IL-1 and prostaglandin. Overall, endotoxins represent a
non-controllable variable in transfection experiment setup, influencing the
outcome and reproducibility of results and making them difficult to compare and
interpret. In gene therapy research, endotoxins can interfere by causing
endotoxic-shock syndrome and activation of the complement cascade.
The level of endotoxin contamination in purified plasmid DNA depends on the purification method used (see table "Endotoxin levels in plasmid preparations"). Silica-slurry¨Cpurified DNA exhibits extremely high endotoxin levels. QIAGEN, QIAfilter, and HiSpeed Plasmid Kits and 2x CsCl ultracentrifugation yield very pure DNA with relatively low levels of endotoxin. EndoFree Plasmid Kits include an integrated endotoxin-removal step to yield plasmid DNA containing <0.1 EU/µg plasmid DNA.
Following clearing of the bacterial lysate using the QIAfilter Cartridge, the Endotoxin Removal Buffer is added to the filtered lysate which is incubated on ice. The lysate is then applied directly to a QIAGEN-tip for plasmid DNA purification.
EndoFree Plasmid Kits yield endotoxin-free DNA which is ideal for high reproducibility and efficiency in transfection (see figures "Plasmid Purification Method vs. Transfection Efficiency" and "Plasmid Purity vs. Transfection Efficiency" and tables "Endotoxin levels in plasmid preparations" and "EndoFree DNA yields high transfection efficiencies with primary cells"). QIAGEN ultrapure endotoxin-free DNA is also suitable for gene therapy research and genetic vaccination (see "Ultrapure 100 Column ") and other sensitive applications.
Endotoxin levels in plasmid preparations*
| Plasmid preparation method | Endotoxin (EU†/µg DNA) |
Average
transfection efficiency‡ |
|
|
||
| EndoFree Plasmid Kit | 0.1 | 154% |
| QIAGEN Plasmid Kit | 9.3 | 100% |
| 2x CsCl | 2.6 | 99% |
| Silica-gel slurry | 1230.0 | 24% |
|
*Host strain: DH5 ¦Á plasmid: pRSVcat |
†1 ng LPS = 1.8 EU |
‡Calculated from data in Figure 9.19 |
EndoFree DNA yields high transfection efficiencies with primary cells
|
Primary rabbit gastric parietal cells were transfected with pEGFP-N2 (CLONTECH) prepared by the methods indicated. Transfections were performed using Effectene Transfection Reagent. The data represent the percentage of cells expressing GFP as determined by scoring the number of green fluorescent cells 48 h post transfection. The transfection efficiencies represent the average from 6 to 9 replicate dishes from more than 2 different DNA preps for each purification method. (Data kindly provided by C. Chew and J. Parente, Department of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA.) |
||||||||||
Plasmid Purification Method vs. Transfection Efficiency
![]() |
Two independent pRSVcat preparations obtained with each method shown were each transfected twice into COS-7, HeLa, and LMH cells using a liposome-mediated method and into Huh7 cells using calcium phosphate. Average transfection efficiencies are expressed as percentages relative to the efficiency obtained with DNA prepared using the QIAGEN Plasmid Kit (100%). |
Plasmid Purity vs. Transfection Efficiency
![]() |
Effect of the amount and quality of plasmid DNA on transfection efficiency in CHO SSF3 X9 cells grown in suspension under serum-free conditions. Each point represents the mean of three independent experiments; Rel. LU: relative light units. Data kindly provided by M. Zang-Gandor, Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland. |
²Ù×÷ÊÖ²á: QIAGEN Plasmid Purification Handbook (PDF version, 389 KB)
|
* For purification of low-copy plasmids and cosmids, EndoFree Plasmid Mega Kits are a better choice than EndoFree Plasmid Giga Kits, due to the large culture volumes required and the limited capacity of the QIAfilter Mega-Giga Cartridge. |